Skip to main content

Chapter 9: One Bridge Apart

Part Three: Not Treating the Structure as Your Own Flaw ｜ 📖 Who's Collecting at the Door ｜ 📖 Full Edition

Chapter 9: One Bridge Apart

Prologue: A Bowl of Beef Noodles for NT$80​

I no longer remember the name of the shop; I think it was simply "Tainan Beef Noodles." It was in Gongxi, in Guishan District, Taoyuan; to get there from the A9 station in Linkou, you crossed a bridge.

It was an old house with the shop in front and the living quarters behind, and an elderly woman did the cooking. A bowl of beef noodles cost NT$80, with real meat and real noodles; braised pork rice was all you could eat, with the braised pork in a Tatung electric cooker and the rice in a wooden tub, and you helped yourself. She cooked it herself, the shop was her own, she made a fixed amount every day and closed when it sold out. In the pandemic years of the early 2020s, when many shops couldn't hold on, she kept making money.

The shop wasn't on Google, and it didn't give receipts. Everyone who knew about it lived nearby.

On the other side of the bridge were the Mitsui Outlet Park and the airport MRT's A9 station. In 2021, I knew of shopfronts around there renting for NT$80,000 a month.

At the time I was just a customer; I ate and left without thinking much about it. Later I never had that bowl of noodles again. Whether she went back to Tainan, I don't know.

This chapter was not originally about her. In early October 2026 I watched two videos, one about young Taiwanese starting micro-businesses and one about teaching children to survive in the age of AI, and read the comment sections of both. By the end, what I thought of was not any case in the videos, but that bowl of noodles, and that bridge.

1. Two Videos, Two Exits​

The first was "Has the Myth of Taiwan's Young 'Micro-Entrepreneurs' Collapsed?" from the channel Tingdian Studio (停電工作室), uploaded in early October 2026.1 Counting down from ten to one, it listed ten brutal truths about going it alone: inventory turning into garbage, the employer's labor and health insurance contributions disappearing, a million dollars of renovation worth nothing at exit, a gap in your résumé; number one was "escape has never been a business model." It ended with three iron rules: parents, don't use your retirement savings to open your child's first shop; test at zero cost on weekends first; treat your company as a paid training ground.

In a sentence: don't go out; go back to a job.

The second was Ah Ju's "How to Teach Your Kids to Survive in the Age of AI," in Cantonese.2 He worked in finance for over a decade and is also a father. He said AI is replacing entry-level white-collar work: what used to take ten new hires can now be done by one person plus AI; children need to learn to define problems, check AI's answers, soft skills, and resilience. Finally, he said AI has greatly lowered the barrier to starting a business: one person can do a whole team's work.

In a sentence: the road through employment is narrowing; go out.

Put side by side, the two videos undercut each other. One says entrepreneurship is a graveyard and only a job is safe; the other says the ladder of employment is being dismantled and entrepreneurship is the opportunity. Both tell part of the truth, but neither answers the same question: whichever exit you take, who is standing at the door collecting?

2. The Entrepreneurship Exit: Pay to Get In, Pay Again to Get Out​

Tingdian's number three was the most vivid case in the video. A retired civil servant put up NT$1.5 million to help his daughter open a dessert shop: NT$900,000 on renovation, NT$600,000 on a coffee machine, an ice maker and display cases. It didn't last ten months. She tried to transfer the lease for NT$800,000; in two months no one asked. A secondhand equipment dealer came and offered NT$35,000 to take NT$600,000 worth of equipment. The landlord demanded the premises be restored to their original state or the NT$100,000 deposit would be forfeited, and in the end he paid another NT$120,000 for a crew to tear out the renovation.

NT$1.5 million to get in, and still more to pay on the way out.

The video tells this story as a warning: don't be impulsive, don't use your parents' money. But list where each sum went, and you see something else. The renovation money went to the renovators, the equipment money to the equipment suppliers, the rent to the landlord; at the exit, the equipment flowed back to the secondhand dealer's warehouse at a fifth of its price, the demolition fee went to the crew, and the deposit nearly stayed with the landlord. The only one who lost from start to finish was the entrepreneur; every other link collected once on the way in and once on the way out.

The comment section was more precise than the video. One person said landlords don't charge you less rent when times are bad, but they'll find ways to raise it when business is good. One said you think being the boss means you control everything, but you're closer to a tenant farmer. One said platform commissions are scarier than physical rent. One said a franchise means spending three or four million to buy yourself the job of the head office's store manager. And one said the signs change again and again, and the only ones with more work than they can handle are the renovation carpenters.

Not one of these comments says entrepreneurs are lazy or naive. They are describing structure: whether or not the shop survives, some people always get paid first.

In "Four Places, and No One Got the Bargain," I wrote that cheapness doesn't land on the last person in line by itself; someone along the way always catches it.3 Micro-entrepreneurship is the reverse of the same thing: costs aren't shared evenly either; they run down the same chain and come to rest on the person with the least bargaining power.

3. The Employment Exit: A Narrowing Ladder​

Tingdian's answer is to go back to a job. But number two in the same video shows how narrow this exit is: after five years spent on a small shop, people who go back to sending out résumés at 32 to 34 find that managers see not entrepreneurial spirit but a skills gap, someone hard to manage, teamwork skills gone rusty. In the end they can only take administrative, retail or delivery jobs paying NT$32,000 a month.

One commenter put it more bluntly: in Taiwan, finding a job after forty is very hard, almost nobody will hire you, and that's why so many people start businesses.

If employment were really safe, so many people wouldn't be running out the door.

Ah Ju's video supplies the other half: the ladder of employment itself is being dismantled. In investment banking, law, accounting, consulting and software engineering, what used to take ten new hires can now be done by one person plus AI. He attributes this to AI.

The comment section didn't quite agree. One person said that even without AI, companies would outsource work to low-wage countries; that has been going on for forty or fifty years, only people don't notice. One said many layoffs in the name of AI are layoffs the company wanted anyway, with AI as the excuse so as not to scare off investors. And one comment asked the question at the heart of it: you say the person who stays will create ten times the value and earn a higher salary, but when ten people compete for one job, the lowest bidder wins, so why would anyone pay him double?

This is exactly what Chapter 1 said: the technology is real, but in every round it is borrowed to give layoffs a name (see Chapter 1); the outsourcing in that comment was the last round's name. Ten times the value may be real, but value and pay are two different things. Where value flows is decided not by technology but by who sits on which side of the bargaining table.

In "The Money Doesn't Leave, and Neither Do the People," I discussed the failure of exit for both capital and labor.4 The comment sections under these two videos are the street-level version of that article: go out and start a business, and outside the exit stand the landlord and the platform; stay in a job, and inside the exit wait outsourcing and layoffs. In both directions someone is collecting; they just collect differently.

4. One Bridge Apart​

Back to the bridge.

In fact, Linkou's old streets still have plenty of old shops with good food at low prices. They don't advertise and few people recommend them; only locals know about them, and only locals go. On the other side, the Mitsui Outlet is packed on Saturdays, but those crowds don't flow to the old shops. The new shops with expensive rents do business with new residents and outsiders.

Within one area, these are two parallel economies that barely touch.

One runs on familiarity. The customers are neighbors; news travels by word of mouth; everyone knows which shop is good, when to go, when it sells out. The other runs on foot traffic. The customers are outsiders who drive in, and new residents who work in Taipei and eat here only in the evenings and at weekends. The first does breakfast and lunch and closes when it sells out; by the time the second group comes home, the old shops have long since closed.

So what an expensive rent buys is not the food, but location, visibility and opening hours. Someone who doesn't know the area, has no neighborhood network and can't tell which shop is good will choose the one they can see, can walk to and that is open. This is the physical version of the algorithm's toll: online shops pay the platform for exposure, physical shops pay the landlord for foot traffic (see Chapter 8). Tingdian's number eight said an online shop with NT$4.5 million in sales paid NT$1.4 million for ads. Move it onto the ground, and that money is called rent.

The Dividing Line Isn't the Bridge​

I had assumed the bridge was the dividing line between the two economies: expensive on the Linkou side, cheap on the Guishan side. In October 2026 I checked asking rents on rental websites and found it isn't so. By the averages listed on 591, a rental site, shopfronts in Linkou rent for about NT$2,200 per ping (about 3.3 square meters) a month and in Guishan for about NT$1,600-odd, a gap of roughly 30 percent, hardly two different worlds. The real gap is between new and old: on the Guishan side, shopfronts in newly redeveloped districts can rent for close to NT$3,000 per ping, more than at A9; on the old streets on both sides, NT$800 or 900 per ping will do.5

To be clear, these are asking rents from 2025 to 2026, not transaction prices, and not 2021 figures; I couldn't find listings on Gongxi's old street itself and could only use other old parts of Guishan for reference.

But the result says even more. What decides rent is not which administrative district you're in but whether you have been drawn into the economy of redevelopment and foot traffic. The bridge doesn't separate Linkou from Guishan; it separates A9's new town from Gongxi's old street.

The old woman was on this side of the bridge. Her shop wasn't on Google; it wasn't on the map of the foot-traffic economy.

The Receipt​

Her shop also didn't give receipts. Under the rules as of 2026, small businesses in Taiwan with monthly sales of NT$200,000 or less can apply to be exempt from issuing uniform invoices, the official receipts, and pay 1% business tax on a turnover assessed by the tax office; mass-market eateries such as noodle shops could in the past apply for exemption even above NT$200,000. So not giving receipts doesn't mean not paying tax; whether she paid, and how much, I don't know.

What I do know is that this channel is narrowing. 2026 to 2028 is a transition period in which shops that adopt mobile payments can keep the 1% rate; from 2029, mass-market eateries with monthly revenue over NT$200,000 must issue invoices.6 Tax fairness in itself is reasonable. But for shops like hers, she was not only on the other side of the bridge but also outside the platforms and outside the invoice system, and that "outside" is shrinking bit by bit.

5. The Noodle Shop and the Tutoring Fees​

Near Zhulinshan Guanyin Temple in Linkou there is a shop selling oyster vermicelli and stinky tofu. It looks family-run: husband, wife, and sometimes a child helping out, open only for breakfast and lunch.

Its conditions are much like the old woman's: family-run, all the staff its own people. By rights it could charge her kind of prices too. But it charges market prices.

At first I guessed at reasons. It is already busy, and cheaper prices would only lengthen the queue, so price is a tool for managing the crowd; perhaps it doesn't want to use its advantages to undercut nearby shops that pay rent. But that is only my guess; what they think, I don't know.

What I am more sure of is something else: the child helping out looks to be in junior or senior high school. Those are the years when tutoring, extracurricular classes and entrance exams cost the most.

If so, the margin that isn't passed on to customers may not stay in the owners' pockets; more likely it flows to cram schools and fees.

Put three shops side by side: the old woman passes the margin on to her customers; the vermicelli shop charges market prices, and the margin may flow to the children's education; the new shops that pay rent have no margin to speak of, because their floor was handed to the landlord from the start.

A cost advantage doesn't automatically become cheapness for customers. Someone always catches it: the landlord, the cram school, or an old woman willing to give it away.

The difference between the two old shops is not necessarily who is kinder, but who stands where in life. At the old woman's age, her children have probably long since grown up, and she has no such expenses weighing on her; the vermicelli shop's owners are at the age when the burden is heaviest. Describing this difference as character is exactly the technique criticized in Chapter 7: describing a structural problem as a personal one (see Chapter 7).

6. The Price of Resilience​

Ah Ju says children should experience failure early to build resilience. That isn't wrong, but failure has a price.

In the comment section under Tingdian's video there is a story. After graduating from university, a young woman wanted to open a restaurant rather than take over her family's central kitchen business. Her father refused to give her money; her uncle gave her NT$2 million and said that when it was gone, that was it, and she wasn't allowed to borrow. A little over a year later the restaurant closed, and she dutifully went back to take over the family business and never mentioned starting a business again. The uncle said the two million was money well spent. The person who told the story said it left him stunned: what ordinary person has two million to buy someone a lesson?

Chapter 3 said that whether you make it through depends in the end on how thick your floor is (see Chapter 3). Resilience is the same: it isn't something teaching alone can give; it is something only people who can afford to fall have. For those with a floor to catch them, failure is a lesson; for those without, failure is a fall.

Describing resilience as personal character and describing a failed business as "escapist consumption" are the same move: turning whether there is a floor into a question of what a person is worth.

7. The People Selling Fear Are Collecting Too​

Under Tingdian's video, many comments mocked its voice-over, which mispronounced words, turning "biscuits" into "biscuit money" and "financial support" into "wafers," and some recognized the voice as resembling a certain financial media host and suspected it had been cloned with AI. A video teaching people not to be leeks was itself content mass-produced at minimum cost, trading on fear for traffic. At the end it asked viewers to like, subscribe and immediately forward it to their children and spouses.

The video opens by saying that 90% of ordinary Taiwanese businesses fail within a year and close to 99% within five, with no source. The cases in it, a monthly rent of NT$55,000, a NT$220,000 coffee machine, a secondhand dealer offering NT$35,000, come with precise figures and likewise no source. Some comments openly questioned whether the script was true.

The more precise a number, the more easily people believe it. Chapter 6 discussed this technique (see Chapter 6); in "A Half-Hour Production Line" I also wrote about how content farms produce.7 This video has both.

That doesn't mean everything it says is false. Opening a shop means counting costs, and exiting has a price; all true. But it turned viewers' fear into traffic and stood beside the exit collecting once itself. On this chain, even the person telling you someone is collecting at the door may be standing at the door.

Epilogue: The Share the Old Woman Gave Away​

Under Ah Ju's video, the most-liked comment was a single line: the only preparation is to make as much money as you can now.

After it came: buy good index funds now and leave them to the next generation; buy AI stocks and leave them to the next generation; it all depends on who you're born to; marry someone rich. And a long string of people saying that not having children is therefore a perfectly sensible decision. In the other video's comment section, too, someone said: the money is all in the stock market.

The video spent over ten minutes on skills, and the viewers' answers all converged on the same place: the floor. Only people with a floor can talk about skills, resilience and choice; people without one treat even having children as a game they dare not join.

The old woman's floor was that shop of her own, with the living quarters behind it. That kind of entry condition is no longer available to young people today. They can't follow her road, not because they don't work hard enough, but because that door has closed.

And she gave the margin that floor brought her to everyone who sat down to eat. NT$80, real meat, real noodles, and beside them a Tatung cooker of braised pork and a wooden tub of rice, help yourself.

In capital's ledger, this is an under-utilized asset. In her ledger, it was her life.

Shops like this are getting rarer, not because they lose to competition, but because they lose to that ledger. When the old woman goes, whoever takes over will very likely do the sums capital's way: rent it out, collect rent every month; why get up before dawn to cook noodles? Once it is rented out, the shop becomes the landlord in Tingdian's video: one person who didn't have to pay for a floor, replaced by one tenant after another, each taking a turn to pay for one.

The bridge is still there. On its far side, the shop signs change again and again.

All I remember is that once, across the bridge, there was a bowl of beef noodles for NT$80.

Summary​

The three chapters of Part Three look at three versions of the same move. In Chapter 7, the people around you describe a situation as personality; in Chapter 8, markets and platforms describe visibility as ability; in this chapter, even resilience and kindness are described as character. People whose businesses fail are called escapists, people who can't find work are said to have skills gaps, people who fall are said not to be strong enough, and whether there was a floor is never part of the discussion.

Whether you can walk out of these structures is another question. The conclusion answers an earlier step: before you go, don't treat it as your own flaw.

← Chapter 8: Who Bought the Mainstream📖 Back to ContentsConclusion: Not a Flaw →

Footnotes​

  1. Tingdian Studio (停電工作室), "Has the Myth of Taiwan's Young 'Micro-Entrepreneurs' Collapsed?" (〈台灣年輕人的「微創業」神話破滅？〉), YouTube, October 2026 [in Chinese]. ↩

  2. Ah Ju (阿豬), "How to Teach Your Kids to Survive in the Age of AI" (〈點樣教仔女喺AI時代生存〉), YouTube, October 2026 [in Cantonese]. ↩

  3. Nebula Walker (星忘塵), "Four Places, and No One Got the Bargain" (〈四個地方，沒有一個人拿到那筆便宜〉), in The Exit Mechanism Trilogy (《退出機制三部曲》), Mythogen Engine [in Chinese], August 26, 2026. ↩

  4. Nebula Walker (星忘塵), "The Money Doesn't Leave, and Neither Do the People" (〈錢不走，人也不走〉), in The Exit Mechanism Trilogy (《退出機制三部曲》), Mythogen Engine [in Chinese], August 31, 2026. ↩

  5. Asking rents for shopfronts (2025–2026, not transaction prices), accessed October 2026: shopfront opposite Mitsui Outlet Park phase 2, Linkou A9, 591; shopfront on Wenhua 3rd Road Sec. 2 and Linkou average rents, 591; shopfront on Wenhua 2nd Road and Guishan average rents, 591; shopfront on Wenhua 7th Road, Guishan, 591; Guishan shopfront listings (Wanshou Road, Huaya redevelopment zone), Rakuya [all in Chinese]. ↩

  6. Specialized CPA Firm (專精聯合會計師事務所), "From 1% to 5%? Invoice Exemption for Restaurants Abolished"; Wanchi CPA Firm (萬齊會計師事務所), "New Tax Rules for Restaurants: Eateries With Revenue Over 200,000 Must Issue Invoices"; Commercial Times (工商時報), "Eateries With Monthly Sales Over 200,000 to Issue Invoices; Finance Minister: New Rules to Be Reviewed After a Year," March 26, 2026 [all in Chinese]. ↩

  7. Nebula Walker (星忘塵), "A Half-Hour Production Line" (〈半個鐘頭的生產線〉), Mythogen Engine [in Chinese], July 21, 2026. ↩