Skip to main content

The Payer Starts Collecting

2026-11-06 · @Mythogen Engine

AI in the Financial Statements, Part 4

First, the accounts​

Intel once used the premium on x86 to subsidise the whole PC ecosystem. From 2022 to 2025, its own free-cash-flow gap totalled US$44.3 billion, and 46% of it was filled by money from partners. The subsidy has reversed direction: the payer has started collecting.

"Where Did the Costs Go?" asked where the big four cloud companies moved their AI costs; that was the buyer's side. This is the seller's side: where a company that used to hand out money moved its costs after its premium disappeared.

US figures come from the annual reports Intel, Dell and HP filed with the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC); Taiwan figures come from quarterly reports on the Market Observation Post System (MOPS). All of them can be recalculated by anyone.

This chain has already fallen once. On 30 October, after Intel issued fourth-quarter guidance, its shares fell 28.58% in a day (Economic Daily News); Gartner estimates global PC shipments fell 22.4% year on year in the third quarter, mainly because higher memory and SSD prices pushed up selling prices (Money Weekly). A week later, it was the whole AI sector's turn.

2006: all of Dell's profit came from Intel​

The New York State Attorney General sued Intel in November 2009. Paragraph 107 of the complaint alleges that Intel's rebates to Dell from February to April 2006 were US$805 million, equal to 104% of Dell's net income of US$776 million over the same period.

In that period, all of Dell's reported profit came from Intel. The subsidy could be paid because x86 carried a monopoly premium: Intel set aside part of that premium for brands and channels in exchange for their loyalty.

Dell was not alone. In 2009 the European Commission found that Intel's rebates to HP were conditional on at least 95% of its business desktops using Intel; for NEC, at least 80% of desktops and notebooks; for Lenovo in 2007, all of its notebooks. Acer and Lenovo took money and delayed launching AMD notebooks.

The legal conclusions were later largely reversed: the EU General Court annulled the rebate parts of the decision in 2022, and the EU Court of Justice upheld the annulment in 2024; only the part requiring brands to delay or restrict AMD products stood. But legal or not, trading purchase shares for rebates is itself a subsidy structure.

The subsidy bought more than purchase volume; it bought the engineering default. From 2019 Intel ran Project Athena (later the Evo certification), with labs in Taipei, Shanghai and Folsom in the US that tested and tuned notebook components for brands, including embedded controllers (TelecomTV); Intel engineers developed models together with brand teams (PCWorld). Analysts noted as early as 2018 that Intel put heavy resources into reference designs and that AMD had nothing comparable (The Motley Fool); in 2024, brands were still complaining to the press about weak support and communication from AMD (Tom's Hardware). When the reference designs, validation labs and engineering manpower all come from one supplier, the brands' engineering defaults follow that supplier too.

The premium is gone​

Intel's gross profit fell from US$43.8 billion in 2021 to US$18.4 billion in 2025, down 58%; the low was US$17.3 billion in 2024.

Subsidies are essentially money taken out of gross profit. In August 2024, Intel's sales and marketing organisation was told to cut costs by 35%, and reports said market development funds (MDF) would be hit hard. Intel later said its total funding for partners in 2025 would be higher than in 2024, but at the same time it reduced the number of partners and distributors it dealt with directly and changed MDF to be paid only after results were delivered.

Under Intel's current partner programme, MDF for ordinary partners is by invitation and subject to approval; rebates go only to the highest-tier partners, also by invitation. The total may not have fallen, but it has narrowed from broad distribution to picking recipients and paying on results.

Nearly half the gap filled by partners​

The free-cash-flow gap: nearly half filled by partners (Intel, US$ billions; 2022–2025 gap totals US$44.3 billion, partner contributions US$20.2 billion, 45.6%)

YearFree cash flowPartner contributions
202110.70
2022−9.40.9
2023−14.31.5
2024−15.712.7
2025−5.05.1

Source: SEC companyfacts annual reports (latest filed values), Intel 2021–2025; free cash flow = operating cash flow − purchases of property, plant and equipment.

From 2022, Intel's free cash flow was negative for four straight years: operating cash flow fell from US$29.5 billion in 2021 to US$9.7 billion in 2025, while capital spending rose as high as US$25.8 billion. In 2024, partner contributions equalled 81% of that year's gap; in 2025 the two almost cancelled out, leaving only about US$160 million.

2026 continued in the same direction: partner contributions in the first nine months were US$5.03 billion, against US$3.65 billion in the same period of 2025; non-controlling interests rose to US$16.6 billion at the end of September (Intel Q3 quarterly report). The same year also had an entry going the other way: in April, Intel paid US$14.2 billion in cash to buy back all the minority interest in its Ireland fab joint venture (Intel Q1 quarterly report). Taking partners' money to build the Arizona fab on one side, using cash to buy back the Ireland stake on the other.

The costs moved to five places​

Intel did not absorb the gap itself; it spread the cost across five parties: partners, new shareholders, existing shareholders, the channel, and employees.

  1. Partners. In 2022 Intel and Brookfield set up Arizona Fab, holding 51% and 49%; of the construction costs Intel bears, US$29 billion are unrecorded commitments. The partner's share is recorded as "non-controlling interests", which rose from US$1.9 billion at the end of 2022 to US$12.1 billion at the end of 2025.
  2. New shareholders. The US government took a stake of about 9.9% for US$8.9 billion, funded by US$5.7 billion of undisbursed CHIPS Act grants and US$3.2 billion from the Secure Enclave programme; SoftBank invested US$2 billion at US$23 a share. Shares outstanding rose from 4.33 billion in January 2025 to 5.00 billion in January 2026, up 15.4% in a year.
  3. Returns to existing shareholders. Dividends fell from US$6 billion in 2022 to zero in 2025. Buybacks were zero in 2022 and 2023, and from 2024 the annual report no longer lists them.
  4. The channel. As MDF and rebates shrink, the cost falls on the small and mid-sized distributors, system integrators and white-box makers that live on subsidies. This layer does not show up in financial statements; see below.
  5. Employees. Intel's headcount fell from 131,900 at the end of 2022 to 85,100 at the end of 2025, down about 35% in three years; in 2025 it also cancelled its planned fabs in Germany and Poland. Severance costs listed in the annual reports totalled US$5.5 billion from 2022 to 2025, and the US$2.48 billion in 2024 was more than that year's dividends. This differs from the "layoffs at record profits" described in "The Efficiency Trap, continued": Intel is laying people off while losing money, but the cost still lands on employees. Those laid off do not necessarily leave the chain: as "The Efficiency Trap, continued" described, some senior staff go on to sell AI courses after being laid off, bought by working people afraid of being laid off; the cost moves from the company to employees, and then from those employees to the next batch of employees.

There is one more way to move costs: in 2023 Intel's capital spending hit a record US$25.8 billion, yet depreciation fell from US$11.1 billion to US$7.8 billion. The reason is that from January 2023 Intel extended the estimated useful life of some production machines from 5 years to 8, adding about US$2.5 billion to gross profit that year. This is the same kind of accounting estimate as Microsoft's extension of server lives in "Where Did the Costs Go?", the legal practice described in Part 2, "Change One Estimate, Earn Billions More".

The ones collecting are still paying out​

In its latest fiscal year, Dell used 87% of its free cash flow for buybacks and dividends; over the same period, Intel paid no dividend.

CompanyFiscal yearRevenueGross marginOperating incomeInventory (prior year)Buybacks + dividends
DellFY2026 (Feb 2025 to Jan 2026)113.520.0%8.110.4 (6.7)7.5
HPFY2025 (Nov 2024 to Oct 2025)55.320.6%3.28.5 (7.7)1.9

Units: US$ billions.

Dell's revenue rose 19% and operating income about 30%; gross margin fell from 22.2% to 20.0%, probably because of a larger share of low-margin AI servers, though the annual data have no segments to prove it. HP's operating margin fell from 7.1% to 5.7%, still profitable. Both companies' inventory grew faster than revenue.

The big brands no longer live on Intel's rebates. In 2006 all of Dell's profit came from Intel; today Dell earns US$8.1 billion of operating income on its own and still pays it out to shareholders, while it is Intel that needs others to buy in.

Both companies' latest annual reports predate what Intel calls the PC adjustment period. The first to cover it will be HP's FY2026 annual report, due around mid-December 2026.

Taiwan: the costs are piling up in inventory​

Through Q2 2026, gross margins at listed distributors and brands were not under pressure; the anomaly is in inventory, where the brands' inventory grew far faster than revenue.

CompanyTypeQ2 2026 gross marginInventory ÷ quarterly revenue, Q4 2024Inventory ÷ quarterly revenue, Q2 2026Inventory change, Q4 2024 to Q2 2026
ASUSBrand17.17%0.991.38+133%
AcerBrand11.37%0.701.15+112%
MSIBrand15.97%0.721.17+59%
GigabyteBrand9.62%0.671.17+285%
WPG HoldingsDistributor4.43%0.660.47+41%
WT MicroelectronicsDistributor3.41%0.610.54+98%
QuantaODM (comparison)5.02%0.630.76+202%

Acer's revenue rose only 27% over two years while its inventory doubled in a year and a half. One explanation is that brands stocked up ahead of memory price rises, but the reason is unproven. The distributors' inventory has moved roughly in line with revenue.

Intel CEO Lip-Bu Tan said the PC adjustment had accelerated over the past two months, with OEMs actively clearing inventory. This happened after Q2 2026; if true, the Q3 2026 filings (all out by mid-November) should show brands' inventory falling, margins under pressure, or both.

"The layer whose margin roughly equals the subsidy is the first to give way" has not yet shown up in the data for these seven listed companies. The layer that truly lives on subsidies is mostly not listed.

What this data cannot see​

  • The size of rebates and MDF. Neither US nor Taiwanese filings have a standard account for them; only the overall gross margin is visible.
  • The unlisted layer. Most small and mid-sized distributors, system integrators and white-box makers are not listed, and they are the ones most dependent on subsidies.
  • Segments. Intel's client business and Dell's PCs and servers cannot be separated in the SEC's standardised data.
  • Cash from the US government and SoftBank. Intel used custom accounts that the standardised data do not capture; this article sees only the increase in share count, with the amounts taken from news reports.
  • The same account can change content. Intel's partner contributions for the first nine months of 2023 were US$2.423 billion, yet only US$1.511 billion for the full year: the quarterly reports had put proceeds from selling subsidiary shares on the same line, and the annual report reclassified them. This article uses only annual figures.
  • Timing. US data are annual only; Intel data were pulled on 8 October 2026, Dell and HP on 30 October; Taiwan data run through Q2 2026.
  • Causation not proven, not back-tested. This article describes structure; it does not give buy or sell signals.

Receipts​

Both predictions below have a check date. When the results are out, I will check them with the same data and definitions, and if I am wrong I will say so.

#PredictionBasisCheck date
1ASUS, Acer and Gigabyte all have lower inventory ÷ quarterly revenue in Q3 2026 than in Q2 (1.38, 1.15, 1.17)Lip-Bu Tan said OEMs had been actively clearing inventory over the past two months; all three grew inventory far faster than revenue in Q2, so if they really are clearing, the Q3 ratio should fallMid-November 2026
2HP's FY2026 operating margin is below FY2025's 5.7%Q3 GAAP operating margin was exactly 5.7%; HP said Q4 PC margins would be lower than Q3 (MarketBeat), but tariff refunds will lift the figureMid-December 2026

Neither has an answer yet. If number 1 fails, either the inventory clearing did not happen, or it happened in the fourth quarter.

Method and sources​

  • US: SEC companyfacts, annual, latest filed values. Intel (CIK 50863), Dell Technologies (CIK 1571996), HP Inc. (CIK 47217).
  • Taiwan: MOPS consolidated statements (balance sheet, comprehensive income statement), single-quarter figures; Q4 is the full year minus the first three quarters.
  • Definitions: free cash flow = operating cash flow (NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities) − purchases of property, plant and equipment; partner contributions = ProceedsFromMinorityShareholders; non-controlling interests = MinorityInterest; severance = SeveranceCosts1; Taiwan gross margin = gross profit (loss), net ÷ total operating revenue.

Sources outside the platform

AI disclosure: the data platform was designed by the author; the code was written with AI assistance, with every change reviewed by a person; account mapping was decided by a person. The first draft of this article was written by AI from the author's analysis and platform data, then reviewed and revised by the author.

This article is not investment advice.

AI in the Financial Statements

  1. One Industry Code, Two Opposite Moves
  2. Change One Estimate, Earn Billions More
  3. Where Did the Costs Go?
  4. The Payer Starts Collecting (this article)
  5. Margins Still at Record Highs, and the First Turning Signal Has Appeared

@Mythogen Engine